Decisions

All

TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2010Hu456 Decided July 22, 2010 [Invalidated Registration (Trademark)] [full Text]
Summary
[1] What provision applies where a provision of the Trademark Act regarding the registration requirement is amended without a separate transitional provision in its addendum (= former provision) [2] We affirm the judgment below holding that the registered service mark is governed by Article 7 (1) 4 of the former Trademark Act and thus is invalid, where a registered service mark "" [본문참조]"" was registered with the intent to use a trademark including the name Paik Nam-june exclusively, for taking advantage of the reputation of the name Paik Nam-june, as the wife of Paik Nam-june et al. considered separately the construction of ""Paik Nam-june Museum""

TITLE

Supreme Court Decision 2010Hu456 Decided July 22, 2010 [Invalidated Registration (Trademark)] [full Text]

Summary

[1] What provision applies where a provision of the Trademark Act regarding the registration requirement is amended without a separate transitional provision in its addendum (= former provision) [2] We affirm the judgment below holding that the registered service mark is governed by Article 7 (1) 4 of the former Trademark Act and thus is invalid, where a registered service mark "" [본문참조]"" was registered with the intent to use a trademark including the name Paik Nam-june exclusively, for taking advantage of the reputation of the name Paik Nam-june, as the wife of Paik Nam-june et al. considered separately the construction of ""Paik Nam-june Museum""

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1151 Decided July 22, 2010[Death Resulting from Bodily Injury]
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2008Du4367 Decided July 22, 2010 [Revocation of Retrial Decision to Remedy Unfair Dismissal and Unfair Labor Practices]

list