TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2014Da42110 Decided July 24, 2015 ¡¼Damages, etc.¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether ¡°production¡± prescribed under Article 127 subparag. 1 of the Patent Act means domestic production (affirmative), whether secondary infringement is established in cases where production occurs abroad and pre-infringement act is carried out domestically (negative) [2] Where the Plaintiff, the patent right holder of the invention named ¡°bi-directional multi-sliding mobile device,¡± filed a damages claim for patent right infringement against the Defendant, a company that produces and exports mobile devices, the case holding that the lower court erred by misapprehending legal principles and rendering that the claim based on the patent right of the invention in Claim 2 constituted an abuse of rights, even if the invention¡¯s patent cannot be deemed invalid for lack of non-obviousness due to Prior Art 1 and Prior Art 4

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da14828 Decided August 13, 2015 ¡¼Damages¡½
Next	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015 ¡¼Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Opening of Gambling Facilities¡½