TITLE	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2013Do11650 Decided August 20, 2015¡¼Violation of the Political Funds Act¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Meaning and limits of the principle of free evaluation of the evidence under Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act [2] In a case where: (a) the Defendant, a Member of the National Assembly, was indicted on charges of having received illegal political funds from ¡°B,¡± the CEO of ¡°A¡± Corporation, on three different occasions; and (b) B initially stated in the Prosecution¡¯s investigation on summons that he raised and donated the political funds to the Defendant, but later reversed his testimony in the first instance trial by denying having donated any political funds to the Defendant, though admitting having raised the fund, and testified to a different use of the funds, the case affirming the judgment below convicting the Defendant of all the charges, taking full account of B¡¯s prosecutorial testimony on how the funds were used, etc., the credibility of which it acknowledged, on the grounds that the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of the evidence

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2012Da204587 Decided August 27, 2015 ¡¼Damages¡½
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2013Da14828 Decided August 13, 2015 ¡¼Damages¡½