TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2012Da85335 Decided May 24, 2016¡¼Wage¡½ [full Text]
Summary
Where a lock-out lawfully initiated continues, despite the fact that workers have subsequently discontinued their industrial action after a certain point in time and expressed their genuine desire to return to work, and becomes aggressive with the purpose shifted to weakening the trade union¡¯s organizing ability, whether the lawfulness of the subsequent lock-out is invalid (affirmative) Whether in such case the employer is exempt from the duty of wage payment during the lock-out period (negative)

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2015Do16701 Decided May 26, 2016¡¼Interference with Business (Changed Name of Crime: Violation of the Copyright Act)¡½
Next	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2009Da66549 Decided May 19, 2016¡¼Damages¡½