Decisions

All

TITLE	Supreme Court Decision 2010Da9153 Decided October 28, 2010 [Cancellation of User Account Suspension, etc.] [full Text]
Summary
[1] The case holding to affirm the lower court's determination that players of the massively multiplayer online role-playing game ""Lineage I"" must be seen as having consented to the standardized contract of the game and all incorporated operation policies, as the operation policies of the game duly form a part of the standardized contract and the game enterpriser separately displayed the above operation policies, to which all players were required to consent to before playing the game [2] In the case where an Internet game user playing the massively multiplayer online role-playing game ""Lineage Ι"" had three or more accounts permanently suspended after using prohibited software such as automatic hunting programs, the holding to affirm the ruling of the lower court, which states that the standardized contract and operation policies of the above game cannot be seen as constituting an unfair contract under the Regulation of Standardized Contracts Act

TITLE

Supreme Court Decision 2010Da9153 Decided October 28, 2010 [Cancellation of User Account Suspension, etc.] [full Text]

Summary

[1] The case holding to affirm the lower court's determination that players of the massively multiplayer online role-playing game ""Lineage I"" must be seen as having consented to the standardized contract of the game and all incorporated operation policies, as the operation policies of the game duly form a part of the standardized contract and the game enterpriser separately displayed the above operation policies, to which all players were required to consent to before playing the game [2] In the case where an Internet game user playing the massively multiplayer online role-playing game ""Lineage Ι"" had three or more accounts permanently suspended after using prohibited software such as automatic hunting programs, the holding to affirm the ruling of the lower court, which states that the standardized contract and operation policies of the above game cannot be seen as constituting an unfair contract under the Regulation of Standardized Contracts Act

Prev	Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1149 Decided October 28, 2010 [Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment ... ]
Next	Supreme Court Decision 2010Du6496 Decided October 28, 2010[Revocation of Disposition of Non-permission of Application for Permission for Naturalization]

list