|
[1] The requirements for pronouncing a judgment without oral statement of a defendant pursuant to Article 365 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the requirements of service by public notice under the Criminal Procedure Act
[2] The case holding that the court below's action that did not take measures, such as contacting the defendant on his cell phone and identifying the place of service, in a case where the defendant who appealed to the court of appeal did not report the change of his residence, and immediately ordered service by public notice and pronounced its judgment without oral statement of the defendant, is against Articles 63 (1) and 365 of the Criminal Procedure Act
|
