º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court Decision 2015Da207747 Decided January 28, 2016¡¼Judgment Execution¡½ [full Text]
Summary
[1] Purpose of Article 217(1)2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Where a defeated defendant ¡ª even if not having followed the method and procedure of service prescribed in order for a court of justice (forum) to grant the defendant an opportunity to defend himself/herself ¡ª can be deemed to have the opportunity to defend his/her actual interests in a foreign court proceeding, whether the defendant can be seen as having responded to the lawsuit under Article 217(1)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (affirmative)
[2] Method of determining whether the procedure leading to recognition of a foreign court¡¯s final judgment, etc. violates good morals or other social order of the Republic of Korea
Where a foreign court¡¯s final judgment, etc. orders compensatory payment to recover a party¡¯s actual loss, whether recognition can be limited based on Article 217-2(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (negative)
[3] Standard for determining whether requirements for mutual guarantee are satisfied as prescribed under Article 217(1)4 of the Civil Procedure Act
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2015Meu654, 661 Decided February 18, 2016¡¼Marriage Annulment etc., Divorce¡½
Next Supreme Court Decision 2014Du8896 Decided January 14, 2016¡¼ Revocation of Disposition Imposing Corporate Tax¡½
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100