º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE ¡¼Syllabus of Latest Opinion¡½ Supreme Court en banc Decision 2018Da296229 Decided May 21, 2026 ¡¼Lawsuit Claiming Collective Bargaining¡½ [full Text]
Summary
¡¼Main Issue and Holding¡½ In cases that are subject to Article 2 of the former Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, whether the previous legal doctrine of the Supreme Court, which ruled to the effect that an ¡°employer bearing the obligation to engage in collective bargaining¡± refers to a ¡°party in a relationship of employment subordination, that is, a party who has entered into an explicit or implicit employment contract with a worker for the purpose of receiving labor from the worker while directing and supervising him or her, and paying wages in return for that labor¡± should be maintained (affirmative)
Prev ¡¼Syllabus of Latest Opinion¡½ Supreme Court Decision 2022Du34425 Decided May 29, 2026 ¡¼Revocation of Disposition Refusing to Make the Correction of Corporate Tax Assessment¡½
Next ¡¼Syllabus of Latest Opinion¡½ Supreme Court en banc Decision 2022Do13370 Decided May 21, 2025 ¡¼Violation of the Medical Service Act¡½
219 Seocho-daero,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100