|
[1] Whether an act of claiming a return of deposit and receiving it constitutes a crime of fraud which intends the bank to be a victim in a case where a receiver acquires a claim to deposit equivalent to the transferred amount by means of the account transfer despite non-existence of a legal relation as a ground for such transfer between remitter and receiver (negative)
[2] The case affirming the judgment below holding that where the defendant as a deposit account owner withdraws money which has been wire-transferred to his account by the remitter who was defrauded by a third party, such an act does not constitute a crime of fraud which intends the bank to be a victim
|
