º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Da200111 Decided July 23, 2015 ¡¼Unjust Enrichment¡½ [full Text]
Summary
Whether a contingent fee arrangement in criminal cases may be evaluated as against good morals and other social order (affirmative); Reference point in time to determine whether a certain juristic action is null and void as against good morals and other social order (i.e., the point at which the juristic action took place), and the standard of the said determination / In cases where the existing attorney¡¯s fees are nominally quoted as contingent fees, whether they may be conclusively deemed null and void under Article 103 of the Civil Act (negative); Validity of a contingent fee arrangement signed subsequent to the pronouncement of this decision (null and void)
Prev Supreme Court Decision 2013Da62278 Decided July 23, 2015 ¡¼Damages, etc.¡½
Next Supreme Court Decision 2014Da233190 Decided July 9, 2015 ¡¼Damages (Med.)¡½
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100