All
TITLE | [Violation of the Public Official Election and Prevention of Unlawful Election Act]Supreme Court Decision 2004Do227 Delivered on January 28, 2005 [full Text] |
---|---|
Summary | |
[1] The limitation upon the election campaign of a labor union as permitted under Article 87 the former Public Official Election and Prevention of Unlawful Election Act [2] The meanings of ""a person who is under his protection, direction or supervision due to business, employment, or other relation"" and ""coercion"" in the crime of obstructing a freedom of election under Article 237 (1) Item 3 of the Official Election and Prevention of Unlawful Election Act [3] The case holding that laborers joining a labor union fall in the category of ""persons subject to protection, direction and supervision due to business, employment or other relation"" under Article 237 (1) Item 3 of the Public Official Election and Prevention of Unlawful Election Act [4] The case holding that the act of producing and distributing a news bulletin to the purport that labor union members not following the resolution of the general meeting of the labor union would be strongly sanctioned with various disadvantages under the internal supervision power constitutes a coercive act under Article 237 (1) Item 3 of the Public Official Election and Prevention of Unlawful Election Act |