º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Attempted Special Larceny]Supreme Court Decision 2009Do9667 Decided December 24, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] The relation of number of crime between special larceny and intrusion upon habitation when a larcenist intrudes upon ones residence as an offense method in special larceny under Article 331 (2) of the Criminal Code(=concurrent crime) and the time to begin a criminal act in special larceny (=the time to look for things to steal) [2] In case where the defendants who were found out when they were damaging visibility installation of apartment door ""in the daytime"" and thereby ran away, were indicted on charge of an attempted special larceny, the case affirming the court below's holding which found the defendants not guilty of special larceny under Article 331 (2) of the Criminal Code on the ground that there was no ""start of commission""
Prev [Damages]Supreme Court Decision 2008Da3527 Decided December 24, 2009
Next [Divorce]Supreme Court Decision 2009Meu2130 Decided Dec. 24, 2009
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100