Decisions

All

TITLE	[Assigned Money]Supreme Court Decision 2006Da37106 Decided November 26, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Where claims to be seized and assigned are clearly stated in the ""disposition"" of an order to seize and assign claims, but an entry of executive title relating to some of them is omitted, whether the effect of the seizure and assignment order reaches such claims (affirmative) [2] Whether the subrogation right based on a right to property transferred for security can be exercised against fire insurance claim acquired by a person who had established security by means of transfer by reason of the loss of secured property (affirmative) [3] Whether a person who establishes security by means of transfer has insurable interest of fire insurance contract which was made over the secured property (affirmative)

TITLE

[Assigned Money]Supreme Court Decision 2006Da37106 Decided November 26, 2009 [full Text]

Summary

[1] Where claims to be seized and assigned are clearly stated in the ""disposition"" of an order to seize and assign claims, but an entry of executive title relating to some of them is omitted, whether the effect of the seizure and assignment order reaches such claims (affirmative) [2] Whether the subrogation right based on a right to property transferred for security can be exercised against fire insurance claim acquired by a person who had established security by means of transfer by reason of the loss of secured property (affirmative) [3] Whether a person who establishes security by means of transfer has insurable interest of fire insurance contract which was made over the secured property (affirmative)

Prev	[Violation of the Securities and Exchange Act] Supreme Court Decision 2008Do9623 Decided November 26, 2009
Next	Supreme Court en banc Decision 2009Do4166 Decided November 19, 2009【Interference with Business】

list