º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act]Supreme Court Decision 2007Do1649 Decided July 9, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether a duty to provide formal advance notice as stipulated in the former Assembly and Demonstration Act is not required where the competent police office already knows that an outdoor assembly or demonstration will be held or such assembly or demonstration will be peaceful (negative) [2] The meaning of ""assembly"" subject to protection and regulation under the former Assembly and Demonstration Act [3] Such assembly falls under the ""assembly"" subject to duty to report under the former Assembly and Demonstration Act, where the defendant held an outdoor assembly with about 10 members of a particular organization for about 25 minutes in front of the house of a political party representative, shouting slogans urging legislation concerning settlement of the past, distributing documents for a press interview, and interfering with the progress of the representative's car.
Prev [Revocation of Disposition to Levy Corporate Tax]Supreme Court Decision 2007Du10389 Decided July 9, 2009
Next [Rejection Decision]Patent Court Decision 2008Heo14230 Decided June 26, 2009
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100