º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ÁÖ¸Þ´º·Î ¹Ù·Î°¡±â
All
TITLE [Damages]Supreme Court Decision 2006Da87798 Decided July 23, 2009 [full Text]
Summary
[1] Whether it is foreseeable that in case a mailman engaged in the delivery of a special service mail improperly served an original copy of the determination as to seizure and assignment order, it will incur damage to an execution creditor (affirmative) [2] Whether the State is liable for the damage incurred by the execution creditor, in case where, although a mailman had made improper service in the course of delivering the original copy of the determination as to seizure and assignment order in the manner of special service, he made a report as if he had made proper service, and thereby the execution creditor could not obtain the assignment of the claim subject to seizure since the seizure and assignment did not become effective (affirmative)
Prev [Unjust Enrichment]Supreme Court Decision 2008Da40526 Decided July 23, 2009
Next [Damages]Supreme Court Decision 2009Da32454 Decided July 23, 2009
219 Seocho-ro,Seocho-gu,Seoul 06590,Republic of Korea 02-3480-1100